Also, as someone who does believe in the negative effects of fluoride, chemtrails, and other even crazier theories I won't even mention, I would find it extremely regrettable to be banned on the Occupy Fredericton page for my differing views than those of admins. Granted that if the posts are inflammatory and derogatory I understand the need for civility; but I can also see things from her perspective which is one of cynicism after dealing with a certain level of ignorance within the general population.
I mean not to cause tensions within Occupies, but I figure my opinion to carry a slight amount of weight given that I've occupied many days straight with the occupiers in solidarity at Fredericton and supplied the footage of the eviction.
So go on, kids, fess up and keep it clean.
Occupy Fredericton He does that. You get used to it.
(Love you, Davey Baby Amos!)
Julian Renaud Matt, you will never be banned for harboring any kind of theory that you may have. No one who posts in a civilized and constructive manner will ever be banned, regardless of ideology.
I think we need to make our position here a little more clear. Truthjuice/Sarah Conner/Sally whatever other fake accounts was not banned for ideological reasons. She was banned for her repeatedly abusive comments towards various people on this page. I have received a lot of complaints about her. Some people complained that she was abusive, others complained that she spammed our wall so much that they just didn't want to read it anymore. We gave her several warnings, all of which she ignored. So, we were left with no choice to ban her, a decision which was not reached lightly.
You'll notice that there are still plenty of anti-occupy people around here that we have not banned. They haven't been banned because they haven't been quite as abusive as "Sarah Conner." As long as they don't resort to argumentum ad hominem or threats, they can stay. The same applies to everyone. I hope this has clarified the matter.
.
Twitter https://twitter.com/OccupyFreddyNB
Government payout for commi squatters ... they removed the link to my website at whose request?
Occupying Space Online ... Alex Davenport blog https://alexdavenport.webs.com/
Beware any org. with the 'fist' logo folks!
"The Philosophy of Sustainable Development
Where does this concept come from? Before I went to the June 1996 UN Conference on Human Settlements (Habitat II) in Istanbul, I was trying to figure out just where sustainable development came from. The number of people serving on the World Commission on Environment and Development who were Communist, Marxist or Socialist provided my first clue. In thinking about that, it occurred to me that this philosophy is not in our Constitution. I then looked in a constitution opposite of ours, the constitution of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (1977). I found my answer in Chapter 2, Article 18, which states,
In the interests of the present and future generations, the necessary steps are
taken in the USSR to protect and make scientific, rational use of the land and
its mineral and water resources, and the plant and animal kingdoms to preserve
the purity of air and water, ensure reproduction of natural wealth, and improve the human environment."



