David Martin - Federal Trade Commission Deceptive Medical Practices and SARS | Facebook
Dr. David Martin and Kim methodically and accurately takes apart the phony story that Moderna and Pfizer are delivering vaccines. He reveals that Moderna admits that their patents say “gene therapy” not “vaccine.” They put a synthetic RNA fragment embedded into a fat carrier, whose only purpose is to lessen the symptoms associated with the S-1 spike protein, not the actual virus.
He proves by referencing the official definition of a vaccine that these are not vaccines. He says you cannot have a vaccine that doesn’t claim to result in either immunity or blocking transmission.
The WHO admits that with these shots don’t do any good. In a virtual press conference earlier this week, WHO chief scientist Soumya Swaminathan was specific: “I don’t believe we have the evidence on any of the vaccines to be confident that it’s going to prevent people from actually getting the infection and therefore being able to pass it on.” By their own patents and reference material, neither Pfizer nor Moderna claims this. Rather they only claim their devices are “gene therapy.”
If this isn’t a vaccine, why are they calling it a vaccine? To gain the broad immunity that only vaccines are given. The 1986 law on Vaccine liability provides an exclusion only for vaccine makers, not for gene therapy—so they would be liable. This is why states are keeping this state of emergency in place to help shield Moderna and Pfizer and the states themselves. The state of emergency maintains the illusion of vaccine shield.
He then explains from a legal view that Moderna and Pfizer qualifys as deceptive practices of making medical claims without clinic trial proof. 15 US Code, Section 41 of the Trade Commission act, is the law on deceptive practices. He shows why Moderna was never a vaccine company. In 2018, it was a gene therapy company, and still is."
No comments:
Post a Comment